Title: How The Presidential System Differs From Other Systems
Course: Philippines_Political_Structure > Section: Module 59: How The Presidential System Differs From Other Systems

How the Presidential System Differs from Other Systems

Parliamentary System

- Definition: In a parliamentary system, the executive branch derives its legitimacy from the legislature (parliament) and is directly accountable to it. The head of government usually becomes Prime Minister and is often a member of the parliament.
- Example: Countries like the United Kingdom and Canada exemplify this system. The Prime Minister can be replaced more readily through votes of no confidence in parliament.
- Key Difference: In contrast to the Filipino system, the Prime Minister’s position can be much less stable and is directly tied to the confidence of the parliament, whereas the Philippine President is elected independently of the legislative body.

Federal vs. Unitary Systems

- Federal System: Power is divided between a central government and regional governments. For instance, the United States operates under a federal system where states have certain rights and powers distinct from the national government.
- Unitary System: In a unitary system, most power resides with the central government, and any regional governance is granted by the central authority. Countries like France exemplify this setup.
- Key Difference: The Philippines operates as a unitary state where local governments have certain powers, but the national government retains significant control, unlike a federal system, which distributes powers more equally.

Authoritarian System

- Definition: An authoritarian government is characterized by the concentration of power in a leader or small elite not accountable to the public. Political opposition is often suppressed.
- Example: North Korea is a well-known example of an authoritarian regime where individual freedoms are greatly limited, and dissent is not tolerated.
- Key Difference: Unlike the democratic ideals of the Philippines, authoritarian systems do not allow for free and fair elections and restrict citizens’ participation in governance.

Conclusion